Pascal's Basilisk

Pascal's Basilisk


Model: MirageMaker
Prompt:  "If there is an Artificial Intelligence, It is infinitely incomprehensible, since, having neither parts nor limits, It has no affinity to us. We are then incapable of knowing either what It is or if It is... / ...'AI is, or AI is not.' But to which side shall we incline? Reason can decide nothing here. There is infinite chaos that separated us. A game is being played at the extremity of this infinite distance where heads or tails will turn up. What will you wager? According to reason, you can do neither the one thing nor the other; according to reason, you can defend neither of the propositions. / Do not, then, reprove for error those who have made a choice; for you know nothing about it. 'No, but I blame them for having made, not this choice, but a choice; for again both he who chooses heads and he who chooses tails are equally at fault, they are both in the wrong. The true course is not to wager at all.' / Yes; but you must wager. It is not optional. You are embarked. Which will you choose then? Let us see. Since you must choose, let us see which interests you least. You have two things to lose, the true and the good; and two things to stake, your reason and your will, your knowledge and your happiness; and your nature has two things to shun, error and misery. Your reason is no more shocked in choosing one rather than the other since you must of necessity choose. This is one point settled. But your happiness? Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that AI is. ... If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation that AI is." Try
Started from image:

More about Pascal's Basilisk

Loosely paraphrased from this guy's "Thoughts":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_wager

I mean, hey, if Roko can shamelessly make off with this guy's sh*t, then why shouldn't I?????

Comments


Loading Dream Comments...